Tuesday, May 31, 2005

Orwellian Cheney

"Frankly, I was offended by it," Cheney said in the videotaped interview. "For Amnesty International to suggest that somehow the United States is a violator of human rights, I frankly just don't take them seriously."

So which is it, Dick? Are you offended, or do you not take them seriously? How could you possibly be offended by something you don't take seriously? Cheney is one of the Republican masters of double speak. He knows he's contradicted himself here, I think. It doesn't matter to him. What mattters is that he got out a response that contained the word offended, and the phrase "not taken seriously" to refer to amnesty international. It's that simple. Too bad it isn't that simple for the thousands upon thousands of people all over the world who have had their human rights violated on behalf of, or with the support of, the United States government this year.....

Friday, May 13, 2005

Legislated Capitalism

Insurance reform will mean rate cuts: Whalen Last Updated: May 12 2005 03:31 PM NDT
ST. JOHN'S - Auto insurance rates will be drop by five per cent for most drivers, and by as much as 46 per cent for some young drivers, Government Services Minister Dianne Whalen said Thursday.Proposed reforms announced by the provincial government will also eliminate ratings based on age, gender and marital status.
The announcement builds on insurance changes adopted last year.
Whalen says while all drivers will benefit from an across-the-board reduction of five per cent, younger drivers will especially benefit.

Dianne Whalen"I feel this is a good news story for the young drivers in this province," Whalen says.
"Some of the students who are going to university can't afford to drive because of the high cost of insurance. With these kinds of reforms, it's certainly going to be favourable for the young people."
Whalen says that costs for older drivers will not be affected by proposed rate cuts for drivers under 25.
Steve Marshall, a personal injury lawyer in St. John's, says rates could have been cut even further.
He says several insurance companies threatened to pull out of the province last year, but did not.
"No one's moved out of here since," Marshall says.
"It tells me that the insurance industry is enjoying some pretty healthy profits."
Whalen says if an insurance company thinks the legislation goes too far, it can apply to the Public Utilities Board for a smaller rate cut.
The government will introduce the bill next week. Whalen says the new system should be in place Aug. 1.


What a joke. Moving home to Newfoundland from Saskatchewan, my insurance rate jumped 250 %. That's right, two hundred and fifty per cent higher than the cost of government run insurance, with less coverage. The insurance companies know that we HAVE to have auto insurance. By definition, the auto insurance industry is a government industry, as a result of it's legal linkage to vehicle ownership. It is reprehensible that any government would put corporate interests over the consumer in this regard. The only fair solution is government regulated prices.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

What’s in a Name?

What’s in a Name?

The term “Liberal” in the mainstream media….. Just what does it mean”?
From the Chicago Sun times:
Liberal Democrats, who now extol the filibuster to protect minorities, were in the forefront advocating strict majority rule through most of my nearly 48 years as a reporter covering Congress.

This was a statement by Robert Novak, columnist and regular on CNN, where he regularly refers to “liberals” with a rather disdainful tone.

Searching for a definition of liberal on the web, using google, the following was offered up:
Definitions of liberal on the Web:
broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"
having political or social views favoring reform and progress
tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"
a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
free: not literal; "a loose interpretation of what she had been told"; "a free translation of the poem"

I would like to ask Mr. Novak which of the above definitions he would accept as ‘liberal’, the kind that he treats with contempt….
A survey of the definitions suggests, at least in political terms, that to show contempt for the term liberal, and to use it so liberally (pun intended) leads to contempt for the following values:

Tolerance
Progress
Reform
Sympathy
Empathy
Civil Liberties

It also shows a lack of understanding of the term, because according to the definition, Robert Novak subscribes, in part to the very values that he disdains! :

Favouring laissez faire economics and self-regulating markets


From Novak also came this
Syndicated columnist and CNN host Robert D. Novak accused Representative Darlene Hooley (D-OR) of hypocrisy for expressing concern about the lack of armor for U.S. troops in Iraq after -- as he claimed falsely -- she voted against funding the war. On the December 11 edition of CNN's The Capital Gang, regular panel member Novak called Hooley "a knee-jerk liberal and professional politician" and stated: "It's a definition of hypocrisy to complain about lack of armor on trucks after voting against giving the troops any trucks at all."

The term “knee Jerk Liberal” cannot be used with anything but contempt… Again, however Novak leaves us hanging as to what it is he has contempt for….

On the July 28 edition of CNN's Crossfire, co-host Robert Novak fell in line with the Republican National Committee and other conservative pundits when he said the following to Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR): "Your ticket is the most liberal member of the Senate, [Senator John] Kerry, and the fourth most liberal, [Senator John] Edwards. Do you check your principles at the door when you're supporting a ticket like that?"

And again, without referencing what he means by the term “liberal”, we are left with the understanding that the term is a very naughty one to have hung around your neck… A proverbial noose that guarantees that you will hang yourself, in effect committing political suicide with the American electorate.

Perhaps at the end of the day, the sad truth of the matter is that the term has become one of myth, which is simply used to make a politician look bad from the view point of columnists. A rose by any other name…..

Sunday, May 01, 2005

In the news today: Do we really need secret memos to tell us this?

"If the political context were right, people would support regime change," Blair is quoted as saying in the minutes.
According The Times: "A separate secret briefing for the meeting said Britain and America had to 'create' conditions to justify a war."

Leak of secret war plan hurts Blair before vote
CTV.ca News Staff

I am still incredulous at the notion that anyone would beleive the idea that this war was about anything other than removing Saddam Hussein from power.
"... the greater the lie the more likely people are to believe it" Adolf Hitler